New contrast agent alternative may replace gadolinium in MRI

After making national headlines this past month, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) to diagnose abnormalities in MRI exams have become a hot topic of debate for radiologists and health imaging professionals.  

According to a recent article by RadiologyBusiness, a new study may have discovered a viable alternative. The study, published in RSNA's Radiology, examined a manganese-based contrast agent, manganese-N-picolyl-N,N’,N’-trans-1,2-cyclohexenediaminetriacetate (Mn-PyC3A), that may have the potential to replace GBCA's in MRIs and other advanced imaging exams, according to the article.  

“Our imaging and pharmacokinetics data support the hypothesis that Mn-PyC3A is a potentially viable alternative to GBCAs,” wrote lead author of the study Peter Caravan, PhD, of the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital. “The relaxivity of Mn-PyC3A is comparable to that of the commercially available GBCA Gd-DTPA, and MR angiography demonstrated that Mn-PyC3A performs comparably to Gd-DTPA for blood vessel imaging. Dynamic imaging of the abdomen revealed rapid blood clearance and mixed renal and hepatobiliary elimination of Mn-PyC3A.” 

Caravan and his colleagues performed magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with both Mn-PyC3A and gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) in female baboons, ultimately comparing the enhancement produced by both agents and other key data. 

For more information about the study, see here.  

""

A recent graduate from Dominican University (IL) with a bachelor’s in journalism, Melissa joined TriMed’s Chicago team in 2017 covering all aspects of health imaging. She’s a fan of singing and playing guitar, elephants, a good cup of tea, and her golden retriever Cooper.

Around the web

GE HealthCare designed the new-look Revolution Vibe CT scanner to help hospitals and health systems embrace CCTA and improve overall efficiency.

Clinicians have been using HeartSee to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease since the technology first debuted back in 2018. These latest updates, set to roll out to existing users, are designed to improve diagnostic performance and user access.

The cardiac technologies clinicians use for CVD evaluations have changed significantly in recent years, according to a new analysis of CMS data. While some modalities are on the rise, others are being utilized much less than ever before.