Study: One-third of radiology recommendations go unacknowledged

In response to a September 2015 report from the Institute of Medicine detailing diagnostic errors in healthcare, including unacknowledged radiology recommendations, researchers from Boston University decided to see just how pervasive the problem was within their institution. 

The results of their subsequent research were recently presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society.

“Investment in information technology solutions and radiology staff dedicated to communicating and tracking radiology findings and recommendations could help minimize these risks,” the authors wrote in the presentation abstract. “However, hospital administrators may be reluctant to commit to these investments if risks are not clearly shown.”

The team set out to assess the magnitude of potential patient harm at their facility stemming from unacknowledged radiology recommendations. They conducted a retrospective review of 6,851 radiology reports, comparing recommendations to clinical charts to see what, if any, changes were made to the patient’s care.

Their results showed that of recommendations made in 857 radiology reports, 650 (67 percent) were followed, while 322 (33 percent) were unacknowledged.

“Our study shows that there is significant risk to patients from radiology recommendations that are not acknowledged by clinicians,” the authors concluded. “Investment in IT solutions and radiology staff dedicated to communicating and tracking radiology recommendations could minimize these risks.”

John Hocter,

Digital Editor

With nearly a decade of experience in print and digital publishing, John serves as Content Marketing Manager. His professional skill set includes feature writing, content marketing and social media strategy. A graduate of The Ohio State University, John enjoys spending time with his wife and daughter, along with a number of surprisingly mischievous indoor cacti.

Around the web

CCTA is being utilized more and more for the diagnosis and management of suspected coronary artery disease. An international group of specialists shared their perspective on this ongoing trend.

The new technology shows early potential to make a significant impact on imaging workflows and patient care. 

Richard Heller III, MD, RSNA board member and senior VP of policy at Radiology Partners, offers an overview of policies in Congress that are directly impacting imaging.