The debate over when women should start breast screenings

 

The optimal timing for initiating mammography screenings in women has long been a subject of intense debate among healthcare professionals, policymakers and the general public. Questions abound regarding whether to start at age 40 or 50, the frequency of screenings and the appropriate age to stop. Debra L. Monticciolo, MD, past-president of both the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and the American College of Radiology (ACR), offers insights from her research and a recent study on this pressing issue.

In a recent study, "Outcomes of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies Based on Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Estimates," Monticciolo and co-authors explored various screening strategy models using real patient data from CISNET in 2023. These models indicate that starting annual breast cancer screening at age 40 provides the greatest benefit with the least risk per examination.

Current breast screening recommendations

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has historically recommended biennial screenings from ages 50 to 74. However, recent 20203 draft recommendations suggest starting biennial screenings at age 40, though still stopping at age 74. Many appalled the movement to screen younger patients.

"We felt it didn't really go far enough, but still it's better than waiting until 50 and we wanted to actually show that with CISNET models," she explained in an interview with Health Imaging. 

She said CISNET has limits because only some data is released, so researchers are still lacking a full picture of how long screening should continue. Because the USPSTF only asked CISNET modelers to look at patients screened up to age 79, that is where the data stops. She said there is a question if screening is necessary beyond age 79, but they need more data to make decisions.

"We screen women over the age of 79 all the time. So there are data for women in their eighties, for example, but they're not published and so we don't have access to it. We'd like that access, but we have to work with the limitations that we have," Monticciolo said.

Study findings show less mortality when screening starts earlier

Monticciolo's study, leveraging CISNET models, evaluated the outcomes of different screening schedules. Key findings include:

   • Annual screening from age 40: This approach yields a 42% reduction in breast cancer mortality compared to a 25% reduction with the current USPSTF recommendation of biennial screenings from 50 to 74.
   • Biennial screening from age 40: This schedule results in a 30% reduction in mortality, an improvement over the previous 25% reduction.
   • Annual screening from 40 to 74: A shift to annual screenings in this age range increases mortality reduction to 37%.
   
Monticciolo emphasizes the benefits of starting screenings earlier and conducting them more frequently. She argues that the risks, such as recalls and benign biopsies, are relatively minor compared to the potential to detect and treat cancer early. 

Risks and benefits or earlier and more frequent breast screenings

The debate often centers on the balance between the benefits of early cancer detection and the risks associated with screening. The primary risks involve being recalled for additional imaging or undergoing a benign biopsy. However, Monticciolo points out that these risks are non-lethal and manageable.

From a woman's perspective, the chance of being recalled annually starting at age 40 is about 6.5%, and the likelihood of a benign biopsy is less than 1%. That figure is reduced to 0.88 using tomosynthesis (3D mammography) and screening annually. 

These figures suggest that the risks are minimal, especially when weighed against the potential lifesaving benefits of early detection.

The study also did an analysis of how this looks from the woman's perspective. She said this is really important, because if a woman that's going for a mammogram, she's thinking, how is this going to affect me? The patients want to know the chances they will be recalled for additional imaging or get a biopsy, and their chances of having a benign biopsy.

"I think doctors want to answer that question for their patients as well. So we looked at the exact same data, but looked at it from the woman's perspective. And when you do that, you will find that annual screening starting at age 40, extending to age 79, actually has the lowest risk of recall on a per exam basis,"

She said that is very, very low. In fact, all the scenarios using the 2023 digital breast tomosynthesis data, the risk of getting a biopsy was 1.25 or less, and the risk of recall was less than 9%. She said this is a reason why many centers are moving toward a wider use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging systems.

Special breast screening considerations for younger women and high-risk groups

Monticciolo also highlights the need for risk assessment, particularly for women under 40 who might be at higher risk. Factors such as family history, breast density, and ethnicity (especially among Black women) can influence the risk of developing breast cancer at a younger age. She advocates for risk assessment by age 25 to identify high-risk individuals who may benefit from earlier screening.

"We really are trying to make women more aware of the need for risk assessment because the prevalence is low for women in their twenties. And then it starts going up in the thirties. Not high enough to recommend general screening for everyone at that age, but for black women in particular and women of color, they're getting tumors at younger ages. And so waiting until 50 was an absolute, it was a bad idea for all women, but it was a disaster for women of color," Monticciolo explained.

The ongoing debate over when to start breast cancer screenings reflects the complexities of balancing benefits and risks. Monticciolo's research supports the notion that annual screenings beginning at age 40 provide significant mortality reduction and manageable risks, offering a compelling case for updating current screening guidelines. As more data and advanced modeling techniques become available, these recommendations may continue to evolve, aiming to optimize outcomes for women across diverse populations.

Find more breast imaging content

Dave Fornell is a digital editor with Cardiovascular Business and Radiology Business magazines. He has been covering healthcare for more than 16 years.

Dave Fornell has covered healthcare for more than 17 years, with a focus in cardiology and radiology. Fornell is a 5-time winner of a Jesse H. Neal Award, the most prestigious editorial honors in the field of specialized journalism. The wins included best technical content, best use of social media and best COVID-19 coverage. Fornell was also a three-time Neal finalist for best range of work by a single author. He produces more than 100 editorial videos each year, most of them interviews with key opinion leaders in medicine. He also writes technical articles, covers key trends, conducts video hospital site visits, and is very involved with social media. E-mail: dfornell@innovatehealthcare.com

Around the web

Positron, a New York-based nuclear imaging company, will now provide Upbeat Cardiology Solutions with advanced PET/CT systems and services. 

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup