Only one-fifth of case reports containing medical images mention a radiologist as the co-author. Those reports were also lower in quality, according to research published online Sept. 20 in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

More than one-third of the errors in radiologist reports are made after-hours by trainees and then confirmed by a consultant radiologist, even though after-hours reports accounted for only 18 percent of all reports, according to research published Sept. 13 in Clinical Radiology.  

A new analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found imaging reports among the top three pieces of patient data physicians electronically received and integrated in 2015.

When a draft report is available to radiologists, report production time may be significantly decreased and workflow efficiency may improve, according to research published in Academic Radiology.

Clinicians view radiology reports more frequently than the actual images, suggesting these interpretations from radiologists are more valuable, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

What should radiology be expending, in manpower as well as money, to help make medical imaging accessible to and from every clinical department? And what’s in enterprise imaging for radiology, anyway?

According to a recent article from Clinical Innovation and Technology, researchers from New York's Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have developed machine learning technology capable of interpreting radiologist reports with an accuracy rate of 91 percent. 

Augmented reality capability compliments TeraRecon 3D Print Pack portal