20% of uninsured medical services in US are imaging related

New research from the University of Chicago found that 60 percent of Americans have been surprised to receive a medical bill that they thought would have been covered by  insurance. Of these people, more than a third reported surprise charges were related to imaging services.  

“Most Americans have been surprised by medical bills that they expected would be covered by their insurance,” said Caroline Pearson, a senior fellow at NORC at the University of Chicago, in a prepared statement. “This suggests that consumers may have difficulty understanding their insurance benefits or knowing which providers are included in their plan’s network.” 

For the study, researchers conducted interviews with 1,0002 adults between Aug. 16-20. The participants provided a sample coverage of 97 percent of the U.S. household population, according to the researchers.  

The most common surprise charges were from physician services, follow closely by laboratory tests, health care facility charges and prescriptions, according to Pearson and colleagues.  

In terms of accountability, 86 percent of respondents said insurance companies are “very” or “somewhat” responsible, while 82 percent said hospital were very or somewhat” responsible, and 71 percent said their doctors are “very” or “somewhat” responsible.  

""

A recent graduate from Dominican University (IL) with a bachelor’s in journalism, Melissa joined TriMed’s Chicago team in 2017 covering all aspects of health imaging. She’s a fan of singing and playing guitar, elephants, a good cup of tea, and her golden retriever Cooper.

Around the web

GE HealthCare designed the new-look Revolution Vibe CT scanner to help hospitals and health systems embrace CCTA and improve overall efficiency.

Clinicians have been using HeartSee to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease since the technology first debuted back in 2018. These latest updates, set to roll out to existing users, are designed to improve diagnostic performance and user access.

The cardiac technologies clinicians use for CVD evaluations have changed significantly in recent years, according to a new analysis of CMS data. While some modalities are on the rise, others are being utilized much less than ever before.