Guidant settles with DoJ for $9.25M on whistleblower suit

Boston Scientific's subsidiary Guidant is on the hook for $9.25 million because it inflated the cost of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators sold to hospitals and reneged on credits owed the Department of Veterans Affairs for replacement of units still under warranty.

In reporting the settlement Monday, the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) said the whistleblower behind the action—Robert A. Fry, a former Guidant sales rep—will reap more than $2.3 million from the deal.

The DoJ statement also cites allegations that Guidant “actively promoted the longevity and reliability of its pacemakers and defibrillators to physicians in an effort to convince them to purchase Guidant products over competing devices. Guidant reinforced these claims by touting the generous credits available should a device need to be replaced while covered under warranty.”

Denise Kaigler, Boston Scientific’s senior vice president of corporate communications said in a statement, “Boston Scientific has denied the allegations but is pleased this settlement resolves all claims in the case.”

The Wall Street Journal
reported that Boston Scientific bought implantable defibrillator maker Guidant for $28.4 billion in 2006 but has struggled to make the costly acquisition pay off.
Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Around the web

GE HealthCare designed the new-look Revolution Vibe CT scanner to help hospitals and health systems embrace CCTA and improve overall efficiency.

Clinicians have been using HeartSee to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease since the technology first debuted back in 2018. These latest updates, set to roll out to existing users, are designed to improve diagnostic performance and user access.

The cardiac technologies clinicians use for CVD evaluations have changed significantly in recent years, according to a new analysis of CMS data. While some modalities are on the rise, others are being utilized much less than ever before.