Artifacts from hair on X-rays shed light on health equity gap

An inquiry from a Temple University student led to the discovery of a gap in medical literature, which is now turning into a research project to advance health equity. 

Third-year medical student Angela Udongwo was studying under radiologist Hillel Maresky, MD, when she asked a simple question: Are X-ray images affected by thick hair in braids, common with Black and brown communities, and are clinicians educated in how to spot artifacts created by hair in images?

After some digging, it turns out that very little research has been done on this question, despite Maresky noting that hair can often create unusual artifacts on X-ray images. 

Now, Udongwo and Maresky are undertaking a project to add to the body of clinical knowledge, and ultimately improve care for underserved populations. It’s important work, because if radiologists aren’t being educated on the different hair styles of Black and brown populations—and how each shows up on X-rays—it could lead to unnecessary imaging or a potentially missed diagnosis. 

The duo told 6ABC News they plan to present their findings as an educational resource and aim to have their research published, in hopes it will improve care delivery nationwide. 

For the full story with a video interview, click the link below.

Chad Van Alstin Health Imaging Health Exec

Chad is an award-winning writer and editor with over 15 years of experience working in media. He has a decade-long professional background in healthcare, working as a writer and in public relations.

Around the web

GE HealthCare designed the new-look Revolution Vibe CT scanner to help hospitals and health systems embrace CCTA and improve overall efficiency.

Clinicians have been using HeartSee to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease since the technology first debuted back in 2018. These latest updates, set to roll out to existing users, are designed to improve diagnostic performance and user access.

The cardiac technologies clinicians use for CVD evaluations have changed significantly in recent years, according to a new analysis of CMS data. While some modalities are on the rise, others are being utilized much less than ever before.