More than 6,000 mammograms reviewed after radiology group misses dozens of cancers

A radiology group in Arizona is under fire after allegedly missing dozens of breast malignancies, some of which were "screaming cancer,” according to a new NBC News investigation. 

“I literally couldn’t believe what I was seeing,” breast surgeon, Dr. Beth Dupree, who consulted with numerous patients impacted by the missed diagnoses, told the network. “These were misses that were not subtle.” 

Dupree reportedly consulted with several patients with questionable mammography interpretations that all occurred within a hospital or clinic owned by Northern Arizona Healthcare (NAH), a nonprofit healthcare system that offers healthcare services through two hospitals and numerous primary care and specialty clinics. During the time of the missed diagnoses, NAH had an exclusive contract with Northern Arizona Radiologists (NAR).  

Eventually, Dupree urged NAH to hire dedicated breast radiologists. One of these was Mike Ulissey, MD, a fellowship-trained breast radiologist. Upon request from NAH, Ulissey and two other breast radiologists were tasked with reviewing 6,344 mammograms that were completed between 2016 and 2018 and had initially been interpreted by a general radiologist.  

After reviewing more than 13,000 images, Ulissey and colleagues identified cancer in an additional 25 women, all of whom required either surgery, chemotherapy, radiation or a mastectomy. 

In an interview with NBC News, Ulissey said he felt the number of women with missed cancers was likely higher than that uncovered by the review. 

“We thought there was a significant chance that additional patients were in harm's way and that we needed to expand our investigation,” Ulissey said. 

But that investigation reportedly didn’t happen. 

In a statement to NBC News, NAH clarified that NAR is a separate entity, and that as soon as concerns were raised, NAH “quickly acted to address the concerns.” Since the review’s completion, NAH maintains that only specialized breast radiologists interpret mammography exams. 

NAR also commented on the matter, stating that the results of the review were “well within national standards,” including those “under the Mammography Quality Standards Act.” 

The investigation centered on one radiologist in particular. That radiologist was not named in the NBC News report, but he is no longer with NAR.  

To view the special report, click here

Hannah murhphy headshot

In addition to her background in journalism, Hannah also has patient-facing experience in clinical settings, having spent more than 12 years working as a registered rad tech. She joined Innovate Healthcare in 2021 and has since put her unique expertise to use in her editorial role with Health Imaging.

Around the web

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.

The newly cleared offering, AutoChamber, was designed with opportunistic screening in mind. It can evaluate many different kinds of CT images, including those originally gathered to screen patients for lung cancer. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup