Another take on the cost of imaging

It’s no secret that radiology has been in the crosshairs of policymakers aiming to cut healthcare costs. Diagnostic imaging is costly, and those expenses are even harder to swallow when studies reveal that some imaging tests are unnecessary in the first place.

But the problem is a complicated one, as diagnostic imaging is an essential tool and too many cuts can cause a different set of issues. The Fiscal Times took a stab at summing up the main drivers in imaging costs—and how to bring those costs down—in a recent article you can find at the link below: 

Evan Godt
Evan Godt, Writer

Evan joined TriMed in 2011, writing primarily for Health Imaging. Prior to diving into medical journalism, Evan worked for the Nine Network of Public Media in St. Louis. He also has worked in public relations and education. Evan studied journalism at the University of Missouri, with an emphasis on broadcast media.

Around the web

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.

The newly cleared offering, AutoChamber, was designed with opportunistic screening in mind. It can evaluate many different kinds of CT images, including those originally gathered to screen patients for lung cancer. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup