ACR praises amendment to surprise billing legislation

The American College of Radiology (ACR) released a statement July 18 applauding the inclusion of an independent dispute resolution (IDR) process in recent legislation to address surprise billing.

The amendment to HR 2328—added by Reps. Paul Ruiz (D-Calif.) and Larry Bucshon (R-Ind.)—allows out-of-network physicians to initiate IDR for in-network claims greater than $1,250, a “critical step” toward resolving the issue of surprise medical bills, according to the ACR.

On July 16, the ACR expressed “serious concerns” with the No Surprises Act, noting a lack of an IDR mechanism. More than 102 medical organizations signed a letter urging the Energy and Commerce Committee to include an IDR amendment.

“Above all, the ACR remains committed to protecting patients from surprise medical bills,” the July 18 statement read. “The ACR will continue working with lawmakers to add further improvement to the legislation.”

Some stakeholders, including the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), argue many emergency services won’t qualify for IDR arbitration, claiming most cost less than $1,250.

“In order to ensure access to emergency care is protected, the qualifying threshold for using IDR must be lowered, or that process will remain out of reach on over 99% of the services provided by emergency physicians,” according to an ACEP statement. “We look forward to continuing to work with Congress on achieving a balanced approach.”  

""

Matt joined Chicago’s TriMed team in 2018 covering all areas of health imaging after two years reporting on the hospital field. He holds a bachelor’s in English from UIC, and enjoys a good cup of coffee and an interesting documentary.

Around the web

Clinicians have been using HeartSee to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease since the technology first debuted back in 2018. These latest updates, set to roll out to existing users, are designed to improve diagnostic performance and user access.

The cardiac technologies clinicians use for CVD evaluations have changed significantly in recent years, according to a new analysis of CMS data. While some modalities are on the rise, others are being utilized much less than ever before.

The new guidelines were designed to ensure sonographers and other members of the heart team have the information they need to screen patients when appropriate and identify early warnings signs of PH.