The limits of big data and transparency

Earlier this month, the release of massive amounts of Medicare payment information jolted healthcare and spurred countless articles analyzing the payments being made to physicians.

While some hailed the data dump as a victory for transparency, others worried about undeserved backlash, particularly against doctors who had extremely high levels of payments when the data doesn’t differentiate between those who may be billing for an entire practice or those whose payments may largely go to high overhead costs.

Writing for The New Yorker, Lisa Rosenbaum looks at the challenges of releasing this type of complex data to the public. “There is nothing wrong with trying to improve the value of healthcare. But better value will depend as much on doing more of what’s good as it will upon doing less of what’s bad. So much of that good isn’t captured by these numbers,” she writes.

You can read the full article at the link below:

Around the web

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.

The newly cleared offering, AutoChamber, was designed with opportunistic screening in mind. It can evaluate many different kinds of CT images, including those originally gathered to screen patients for lung cancer. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup