MGMA: Rank, geography affect doc compensation in academic settings

Geographic section and department rank were found to influence compensation in academic settings, according to a report from the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA).

For example, dermatologists in academic settings reported median compensation of $277,765 in the Midwest and $234,936 in the Western region, according to the Englewood, Colo.-based organization. General pediatricians in the East reported $157,289 in median compensation and in the Southern section reported median compensation of $139,410. In the Eastern section, urologists reported $368,401 in median compensation, compared with $300,000 in the Midwest, $336,000 in the Southern section and $445,247 in the Western section.

The report “Academic Practice Compensation and Production Survey for Faculty and Management: 2012 Report Based on 2011 Data,” noted that department rank may also influence compensation. As rank (which some use as a proxy for years of experience) increases, so does compensation. According to the report, primary care associate professors reported $173,963 in median compensation and professors reported median compensation of $198,000. Primary care department chairs reported median compensation of $282,296. Specialty care associate professors earned $260,075 and professors earned $280,000. Specialty care department chairs reported median compensation of $506,200.

“When determining compensation in academic settings, clinical productivity, research support, educational activity (such as rounding and mentoring), as well as endowments and philanthropy, are taken into account,” said Jonathan Tamir, MBA, vice chairman, finance and administration, department of internal medicine, Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Conn. "Additionally, salary levels may be supported for promising faculty and/or faculty conducting unfunded research in the organization’s areas of interest or specialization by using departmental reserves.”

Physician compensation in academic settings continued to trail that of physicians in private practice, the report noted. “Family practitioners in academic settings reported median compensation of $173,801, compared with $189,402 in private practice.”

Specialists in academic settings also reported median compensation that trailed physician earnings in private practice. Anesthesiologists earned $326,000 in median compensation in academic settings, $407,292 in private practice. General surgeons in academic settings earned $297,260 in median compensation, compared to $343,958 in private practice.

"Physicians in private practices concentrate their effort on providing clinical care to patients while physicians in academic practices split their efforts between clinical care and research activities. These research activities are never as well compensated as clinical care,” said Tamir.   

The report, according to MGMA, contains data on more than 20,000 faculty physicians and nonphysician providers categorized by specialty, and more than 2,000 managers.

Around the web

The new technology shows early potential to make a significant impact on imaging workflows and patient care. 

Richard Heller III, MD, RSNA board member and senior VP of policy at Radiology Partners, offers an overview of policies in Congress that are directly impacting imaging.
 

The two companies aim to improve patient access to high-quality MRI scans by combining their artificial intelligence capabilities.