How is interpreting a CT for Joe not ‘Joe-centered’ radiology?

As the concept of patient-centered radiology becomes a ubiquitous touchpoint within the profession, some are questioning what, exactly, “PCR” consists of—both as an ideal and in real-world, daily practice.

The influential radiologist Saurabh Jha takes up the question in breezy yet substantive commentary published Aug. 10 at Medscape.com. 

“Radiologists may reasonably wonder how interpreting a CT for Joe performed for abdominal pain is not Joe-centered radiology,” he writes.

More:

“It must be emphasized that speaking to patients will not increase the radiologist’s bottom line. However, holding this activity ransom to reimbursement is rather akin to refusing to leave the Titanic until another Titanic comes along. … If the mountain will not come to Muhammed, then Muhammed must go to the mountain—or at least attend the daily rounds in the intensive care unit.”

Read the whole thing:

Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Around the web

CCTA is being utilized more and more for the diagnosis and management of suspected coronary artery disease. An international group of specialists shared their perspective on this ongoing trend.

The new technology shows early potential to make a significant impact on imaging workflows and patient care. 

Richard Heller III, MD, RSNA board member and senior VP of policy at Radiology Partners, offers an overview of policies in Congress that are directly impacting imaging.