Why is compression mammography the gold standard for breast cancer screening?

In Harvard Health Publications, Hope Ricciotti, MD and Hye-Chun Hur, MD, MPH, discuss the question: “Why isn’t there a better way to take a mammogram?” This comes after a user shared her concern on being smashed, squashed, pulled and tugged annually for 25 years.

The doctors note, for decades, compression mammography has been the “gold standard.” Many studies have proven it to be the most effective way to detect breast cancer as it flattens the breast and makes ductal tissue easier to distinguish while reducing the amount of radiation.

Although this screening has been effective, radiologists are continuing research to improve the experience for women. In the article, the writers outline a 2014 study of women who underwent screening mammography using both the conventional compression technique and compression based on the individual woman’s breast size and stiffness. The women reported less discomfort following mammography when used a personalized compression plan.

Read what the doctors have to say about this approach: 

Jodelle joined TriMed Media Group in 2016 as a senior writer, focusing on content for Radiology Business and Health Imaging. After receiving her master's from DePaul University, she worked as a news reporter and communications specialist.

Around the web

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.

The newly cleared offering, AutoChamber, was designed with opportunistic screening in mind. It can evaluate many different kinds of CT images, including those originally gathered to screen patients for lung cancer. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup