AAPM: Gonadal, fetal shielding during x-ray should be ‘discontinued’

Patient gonadal and fetal shielding during x-ray imaging is unnecessary and should be "discontinued" as routine practice, according to a new position statement from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM).

“Use of these shields during x-ray based diagnostic imaging may obscure anatomic information or interfere with the automatic exposure control of the imaging system,” according to the AAPM statement. “These effects can compromise the diagnostic efficacy of the exam, or actually result in an increase in the patient’s radiation dose.”

If shielding can reduce a patient’s fear and anxiety about radiation exposure and produce a higher-quality exam, the healthcare provider may proceed with shielding, according to the statement. Radiation doses during diagnostic imaging are not associated with harm to the gonads or fetus.

Additionally, patient shielding can obscure anatomy and require repeated exams. It can also have a negative impact on image quality, according to the statement.

For years such shielding has remained consistent with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle designed to minimize radiation doses, but current technology and evidence has found such practices to be ineffective.

""

Matt joined Chicago’s TriMed team in 2018 covering all areas of health imaging after two years reporting on the hospital field. He holds a bachelor’s in English from UIC, and enjoys a good cup of coffee and an interesting documentary.

Around the web

GE HealthCare said the price of iodine contrast increased by more than 200% between 2017 to 2023. Will new Chinese tariffs drive costs even higher?

These risks appear to be present regardless of a person's age or health at the time of infection.

Agfa and Sectra both performed well with end-user satisfaction scores in the 2025 Best in KLAS list of radiology IT systems.