SBRT found most effective for treating ground glass nodule patients

New research suggests clinicians should increase follow-up times for evaluating ground-glass nodules (GGNs) found on CT from one to three years, according to a study published in Radiology.

The researchers created a simulation model for one million hypothetical patients with GGNs who would have undergone follow-up as directed by the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) recommendations. They were on average 64 years old.

Mark M. Hammer, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and colleagues tested the effectiveness of annual versus three-year interval follow-up of Lung-RADS category 2 nodules. They also compared three treatment strategies: stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), surgery and no therapy.

A total of 2.3 percent of nodules were clinically significant malignancies, and 30 percent of Lung-RADS category 4B or 4X nodules were clinically significant malignancies. Overall survival at 10 years was 72 percent with annual follow-up and 71 percent with three year follow-up.

“Our results argue for raising the follow-up interval for GGNs to 3 years,” Hammer et al. wrote. “While there is a high rate of malignancy in these [GGN] nodules at biopsy, the rate of clinically significant malignancy is lower, and, overall, these malignancies demonstrate an indolent course.”

The team found SBRT the most effective treatment. Overall survival in patients receiving SBRT was 80 percent, compared to 79 percent and 74 percent after surgery and no therapy, respectively.

""

Matt joined Chicago’s TriMed team in 2018 covering all areas of health imaging after two years reporting on the hospital field. He holds a bachelor’s in English from UIC, and enjoys a good cup of coffee and an interesting documentary.

Around the web

GE HealthCare designed the new-look Revolution Vibe CT scanner to help hospitals and health systems embrace CCTA and improve overall efficiency.

Clinicians have been using HeartSee to diagnose and treat coronary artery disease since the technology first debuted back in 2018. These latest updates, set to roll out to existing users, are designed to improve diagnostic performance and user access.

The cardiac technologies clinicians use for CVD evaluations have changed significantly in recent years, according to a new analysis of CMS data. While some modalities are on the rise, others are being utilized much less than ever before.