Factors identified for recruiting future academic radiologists

Radiology residency selection committees should consider undergraduate and medical school rankings and publications, medical school research year, and additional advanced degrees to recruit future academic radiologists, according to a study published online March 12 by Academic Radiology.

Many have tried to target which variables on residency applications consistently identify those likely to pursue an academic career in radiology, yet findings thus far have been inconsistent. Lead author Lars J. Grimm, MD, MHS, of Duke University Hospital in Durham, N.C., and colleagues evaluated a diverse range of elements from radiology residency applications from two institutions that spanned 20 years to identify any predictive values of future academic radiology careers.

The authors’ analysis included 336 radiologists, 231 of whom were men and 105 of whom were women. Of the study population, 21 percent were classified as academic. A positive association was observed between an academic career and attending an elite undergraduate school, publishing a peer-reviewed manuscript during undergraduate school, receiving an advanced degree, attending an elite medical school, pursuing a dedicated year of research in medical school and publishing a peer-reviewed manuscript in medical school. An academic career was also positively associated with the applicant’s number of publications during medical school.

Multivariate cross-validation analysis demonstrated that the 19 total analyzed variables could collectively predict whether or not an applicant will pursue an academic career.

“Radiology residency selection committees should consider these results if they are planning on recruiting resident applicants for future academic careers,” concluded Grimm and colleagues.

Around the web

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.

The newly cleared offering, AutoChamber, was designed with opportunistic screening in mind. It can evaluate many different kinds of CT images, including those originally gathered to screen patients for lung cancer. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup