Neurorad blogger puts intracranial-pressure imaging in focus

Imaging findings of intracranial pressure (ICP) should never be interpreted in a vacuum, as asymptomatic patients with isolated nonspecific imaging findings are unlikely to have an ICP disorder.

That’s one of several guiding principles on avoiding imaging-based ICP misdiagnoses offered by neuroradiologist Amit Saindane, MD, of Emory University in an April 7 Oxford University Press blog.

Along with the pointers, Saindane provides a concise primer on the latest thinking on ICP imaging.

“Imaging with computed tomography (CT), or more commonly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently performed as part of [an initial] diagnostic workup,” Saindane writes. “While imaging was traditionally obtained to exclude key important diagnoses (such as brain tumor and hydrocephalus), numerous recent studies have shown that there are a variety of imaging findings that have high associations with chronically elevated or decreased ICP.”

Read the post: 

Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Around the web

CCTA is being utilized more and more for the diagnosis and management of suspected coronary artery disease. An international group of specialists shared their perspective on this ongoing trend.

The new technology shows early potential to make a significant impact on imaging workflows and patient care. 

Richard Heller III, MD, RSNA board member and senior VP of policy at Radiology Partners, offers an overview of policies in Congress that are directly impacting imaging.