“Alzheimer’s disease is probably the most underfunded disease in the U.S.,” charges Dean M. Hartley, PhD, director of science initiatives, medical and scientific relations, for the Alzheimer’s Association.

An exploration of recent projects at Argonne National Laboratory and Johns Hopkins University traverse the numerical and graphical landscape of cerebral blood flow, the pathology of malaria, brain aneurysm, sickle cell anemia and even cancer.

The past year has been a groundbreaking one for neurology. 

When I began my PhD research almost 40 years ago, nuclear medicine research was almost entirely focused on diagnosis. 

Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA), a major molecular medicine company based in Bourg en Bresse, France, announced Mar. 4 that the firm had acquired 100 percent of shares of the privately held U.K.-based Imaging Equipment, a distributor of nuclear medicine technologies and radiopharmaceuticals across the U.K. and Ireland.

The question of appropriate use of advanced nuclear medicine procedures is more salient than it has ever been, with overall health cost under government scrutiny and imaging eyed in particular due to increasing procedure numbers. Some experts are pointing to non-medical news sites and other media as a culprit in patient demand for potentially inappropriate PET use, according to a study published Feb. 18 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

PET/MR has been poised on the cutting edge of imaging for a few years, but the hybrid modality still faces a number of challenges keeping it from widespread use in clinical practice.

There are two main questions that remain on the minds of those evaluating PET/MR for clinical practice: Is PET/CT just as good? If yes, isn’t PET/CT cheaper? These questions are answered with a resounding ‘sometimes,’ according to a review published Feb. 20 in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine.