PET/CT helps track response, progression in patients with difficult-to-treat prostate cancer

Pairing PET/CT imaging with prostate-specific antigen testing may help gauge treatment response and disease progression in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, according to new information presented during the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 virtual meeting.

The study, reported on by Renal & Urology News, had 123 men with the disease undergo serial PSA testing and C-11 choline PET/CT scans every 3 to 6 months.

About 40% of patients who received second-generation hormone therapy post-taxane-based chemotherapy experienced imaging-based disease progression, despite stable or falling PSA levels.

Additionally, 60.4% of patients who received one of two therapeutic drugs (abiraterone or enzalutamide) showed a parallel rise in PSA levels at the time of PET/CT-based progression, compared to the 39.6% with stable or declining levels.

Study author Jamal Alamiri, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, hypothesized that imaging-based progression can happen despite stable or declining PSA levels after prostate cancer cells gain treatment-induced mechanisms resistant to therapies. It is “unknown” whether this explains the findings in their own research, he told the news outlet.

Read more of the study results from Renal & Urology News below.

""

Matt joined Chicago’s TriMed team in 2018 covering all areas of health imaging after two years reporting on the hospital field. He holds a bachelor’s in English from UIC, and enjoys a good cup of coffee and an interesting documentary.

Around the web

CCTA is being utilized more and more for the diagnosis and management of suspected coronary artery disease. An international group of specialists shared their perspective on this ongoing trend.

The new technology shows early potential to make a significant impact on imaging workflows and patient care. 

Richard Heller III, MD, RSNA board member and senior VP of policy at Radiology Partners, offers an overview of policies in Congress that are directly impacting imaging.