Trump's cuts to NIH face opposition in Congress

William Doss | | Health Imaging | Artificial Intelligence

The public’s reaction to Presidents Trump’s proposed budget has been incendiary—but for good reason: Federal science programs such as the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Energy Office of Science and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) all would see cuts of 18 percent or more. However, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are voicing opposition.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research office would see a 52 percent budget reduction, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy would be completely eliminated.

While some research can be viewed through a partisan lens—for example, climate science—lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have spoken out against the cuts to the NIH. Representative Tom Cole, R-Oklahoma, the chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee responsible for the NIH, told the New York Times he took considerable pride in Congress’s regular increases in funding, resulting in doubling the research institute’s budget from 1998 to 2003.

With cuts totaling $5.8 billion, the Trump administration believes much of the savings can come from reducing federal payments to research institutions reimbursing them for indirect costs. Indirect costs include utilities, internet service, data storage, construction and upkeep of laboratories­—everything that’s not the research itself, taking up about 30 percent of grant money distributed by the NIH.

Unfortunately, those indirect costs are very real for the universities and health institutes and could force them to cut research, according to Landon S. King, MD, executive vice dean at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

Follow the link below to learn about the proposed budget’s deleterious effects on research:

Plan to Cut Funding for Biomedical Research Hits Opposition in Congress

William Doss

As a Senior Writer for TriMed Media Group, Will covers radiology practice improvement, policy, and finance. He lives in Chicago and holds a bachelor’s degree in Life Science Communication and Global Health from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He previously worked as a media specialist for the UW School of Medicine and Public Health. Outside of work you might see him at one of the many live music venues in Chicago or walking his dog Holly around Lakeview.

Related Content

How does breast density affect AI accuracy?
New AI-enabled CT system is officially available in North America
GBCA dose reduced by up to 80% with help from deep learning-based image reconstruction
Deep learning-based reconstruction nearly halves spinal MRI acquisition times
Experts highlight 'significant concerns' with fluctuating accuracy of popular large language models
FDA clears AI screening tool for cardiac amyloidosis

Around the web

Cardiovascular Business
Positron partners with Upbeat Cardiology Solutions to improve cardiac PET/CT access

Positron, a New York-based nuclear imaging company, will now provide Upbeat Cardiology Solutions with advanced PET/CT systems and services. 

Cardiovascular Business
Global shortage of nuclear imaging isotopes may be over

The nuclear imaging isotope shortage of molybdenum-99 may be over now that the sidelined reactor is restarting. ASNC's president says PET and new SPECT technologies helped cardiac imaging labs better weather the storm.

Cardiovascular Business
‘A huge win’: CMS significantly increases Medicare payments for cardiac CT

CMS has more than doubled the CCTA payment rate from $175 to $357.13. The move, expected to have a significant impact on the utilization of cardiac CT, received immediate praise from imaging specialists.